Delivered directly by us
All implementation, integration, and migration work is currently delivered by our own team across the United States. Nothing in the product requires a local partner.
Partners
This list is short, and it will stay short. We certify only partners doing genuine co-delivery, and a long directory tells a buyer very little because the variance within it exceeds the difference between being on it and not.
Tell us where you are and what you need. If a partner fits we will introduce you; if not, we will say so.
Partners
We are early enough that this is a description of coverage rather than a directory of firms. Where we have no partner in your region, we deliver directly.
All implementation, integration, and migration work is currently delivered by our own team across the United States. Nothing in the product requires a local partner.
Several firms refer clients and take auditor access on engagements. Referral relationships are not listed here — a referral is not a delivery capability and listing it would be misleading.
Multiple practices use our diagnostics across their client books. Again, referral rather than delivery, so not listed as partners.
Certified co-delivery partners appear here by name as the programme grows. We would rather show an empty section honestly than pad it with referral relationships.
That a firm understands the data model, permission model, and reconciliation methodology. It is not our warranty of their delivery quality and we do not present it as one.
Tell us. Where we have no partner and cannot serve you well directly, we will say so rather than stretching to cover it.
Our own failure research found the software being genuinely incapable was the primary cause in about 4% of stalled implementations. Requirements, data quality, and decision authority accounted for roughly three quarters. Certification tests none of those.
So whether you are choosing a partner from this page or from anywhere else, the three questions that predict outcomes are the same: how many deployments did you complete last year for companies our size, who specifically will be assigned to us, and can we speak to two references whose projects overran.
That guidance is written up in full on our page about choosing an implementation consultant, and it applies to us as much as to anyone else.
We will also remove a firm that presents certification as our endorsement of their delivery quality, configures a client past the agent authority ceiling, or fails to disclose a referral fee. We would tell the firm first, and we would tell the affected client.
Most mid-market ERP is sold through partners, and across the stalled implementations we have been called into, the spread between a strong and a weak partner exceeded the spread between the products they were implementing.
We sell direct and implement ourselves, which has real disadvantages we state on our comparison pages: no local presence, no vertical specialists in industries we have not worked in, and no capacity buffer when demand exceeds our team. A large partner network solves all three, and introduces the failure mode we spend a lot of pages warning buyers about.
If your requirement is local hands-on implementation capacity across many industries, an established Acumatica or Business Central partner in your city is offering something we genuinely cannot. That is worth knowing before you evaluate us.
We could list every accounting firm and fractional CFO practice that has ever referred a client and call it a partner directory. It would look substantial and it would tell you nothing about who can actually deliver. Referral relationships are real and valuable; they are not delivery capability, and conflating the two is how directories in this category stop being useful.
Questions
A long directory looks substantial and tells a buyer very little. We would rather show you an honest one.