ERP by industry

ERP software for real estate and property companies

Real estate is the industry where entity count breaks the accounting system. One legal entity per property is normal, twenty entities is unremarkable, and consolidating them by hand every month is where most property companies spend their close.

How many entities?

Tell us your entity count and how you consolidate today. We will show you what continuous consolidation changes.

1 / 3
Built for many entitiesNOI by asset and portfolioInvestor reporting automated

The problems

Six things we hear in the first call.

Almost all of these trace back to a structure where each property is its own entity and the accounting system was designed for one.

Consolidation is a monthly workbook

Twenty entities exported, pasted into tabs, intercompany eliminated from memory, and a portfolio P&L produced by one person under time pressure at the end of the close.

NOI is computed outside the ledger

Net operating income by asset requires revenue, operating expense, and a consistent view of what counts as operating. Most portfolios compute it in Excel with a mapping that lives nowhere.

CAM reconciliation is annual and contested

Common area maintenance recovery is reconciled once a year against estimates billed monthly, and tenants dispute it because the underlying detail is difficult to produce.

Investor reporting is bespoke per fund

Each investor group wants a different pack on a different schedule, assembled by hand from the same data, with capital account balances maintained separately.

Intercompany between entities is manual

Management fees, shared services, and cash sweeps between related entities are recorded on both sides by hand and rarely agree exactly.

Capex against opex is a judgement

Whether a roof replacement is capitalised or expensed changes NOI, distributions, and covenant compliance, and the decision is made inconsistently across properties.

Where the money goes

Gross rent to distributable cash, in six deductions.

A representative shape for a commercial portfolio. NOI sits above debt service, which is why it is the number lenders and buyers both anchor on.

100%Gross potential rent8%Vacancy & concessions31%Operating expenses4%Management fees34%Debt service6%Capex reserve17%Distributablerepresentative commercial property economics · asset class and leverage change this substantially
The capex judgement moves several numbers at once

Whether a major repair is capitalised or expensed changes NOI, which changes valuation, covenant headroom, and what can be distributed. Applied inconsistently across properties — which it usually is, because the decision is made property by property — it makes portfolio comparison unreliable in exactly the analysis it is most used for.

Your stack

We do not ask you to move everything.

Your property management system keeps handling leases, tenants, and maintenance. What changes is that the financial layer above it stops being manual.

Consolidated into erp.io

  • Multi-entity consolidation workbooks
  • NOI calculation spreadsheets
  • CAM reconciliation schedules
  • Investor capital account tracking
  • Intercompany elimination by hand
  • Investor reporting pack assembly

Kept and integrated

  • Yardi, AppFolio, MRI or Buildium
  • Your lease administration tool
  • Gusto, Rippling or ADP
  • QuickBooks, Xero or Intacct
  • Lenders and debt servicers
  • Ramp, Brex or Bill.com

Benchmarks

What good looks like at this size.

Drawn from our own engagements with property companies between $10M and $80M in revenue. The bar is a typical erp.io customer after two quarters; the marker is the segment median.

Days to close the month
8 daysmedian 18 days
Days to consolidate portfolio
1 daymedian 6 days
Entities reconciled continuously
100%median 24%
Days to produce investor pack
3 daysmedian 14 days
CAM detail available on demand
yesmedian annual
Intercompany agreeing both sides
99%median 68%

Entity count is the whole problem

Most accounting systems handle one entity well, two acceptably, and nine badly. Real estate routinely runs twenty or more because lenders and investors require single-purpose entities, and that requirement is not negotiable.

The result is a portfolio whose financial picture only exists inside a spreadsheet, produced once a month, by one person, with intercompany eliminated from memory. It is correct and it is unauditable, and it is the single most common thing we replace in this industry.

Lenders require an entity per property. Accounting systems were built for one. Everything painful in property accounting follows from that.

Continuous consolidation changes the question

When consolidation is a monthly exercise, the portfolio view is a month-end artefact and nobody asks about portfolio performance in week two because the answer would take two days to produce.

When it is continuous, the question becomes ordinary. That changes what gets asked — trailing twelve-month NOI by asset, expense variance across comparable properties, which assets are trending against underwriting — and those questions are where portfolio management actually happens.

CAM reconciliation, from the detail up

Common area maintenance reconciliation is contested because tenants receive a summary and ask for the detail, and the detail requires reconstructing a year of expense allocation across a pro-rata share calculation that lives in a lease abstract.

Where operating expenses are coded to property and category as incurred, and pro-rata shares are held as data rather than in a lease document, the reconciliation computes itself and the supporting detail is available on request rather than on reconstruction. That alone substantially reduces the annual argument.

Investor reporting without the workbook

Capital accounts, preferred returns, waterfall distributions, and per-investor reporting are maintained in a spreadsheet in most property companies of this size, and the spreadsheet is the definitive record of what investors are owed.

Holding capital accounts and distribution waterfalls as data — with the agreement terms encoded rather than remembered — makes investor reporting a query and removes the single most consequential workbook in the business.

Where we are not the right answer

We are not a property management system. Lease administration, tenant portals, maintenance requests, and rent collection workflow belong in Yardi, AppFolio, MRI, or Buildium, and we integrate rather than compete. Companies whose primary requirement is property operations rather than portfolio finance should invest there first. We are also not a fund administration platform for complex multi-fund structures with institutional LPs.

Questions

What companies ask.

Do you replace Yardi or AppFolio?
No. Lease administration, tenant portals, and maintenance workflow stay there. We handle portfolio finance above them.
How many entities can you handle?
Multi-tier structures with dozens of entities. The constraint is the quality of the underlying books rather than the count.
Do all entities need to be on erp.io?
No. Entities can stay on their existing systems and be read into the graph. Mixed portfolios are the normal case.
Can you handle CAM reconciliation?
Yes, computed from operating expense coded to property and category as incurred, with pro-rata shares held as data. The supporting detail is available on request rather than reconstructed.
What about investor capital accounts?
Capital accounts, preferred returns, and distribution waterfalls held as data with the agreement terms encoded. It removes the most consequential workbook in most property companies.

Retire the consolidation workbook.

Send your entity structure and how you consolidate today. We will show you what it is quietly plugging.